{"id":2614,"date":"2010-10-07T10:45:13","date_gmt":"2010-10-07T17:45:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=2614"},"modified":"2010-10-07T11:18:02","modified_gmt":"2010-10-07T18:18:02","slug":"capx-2020-in-the-news-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=2614","title":{"rendered":"CapX 2020 North Dakota in the news"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There was a very strange report from North Dakota &#8211; somewhere on the CapX 2020 Fargo-St. Cloud road show last week, they were asked about the permitting status of that line in North Dakota, and we got some blather that wasn&#8217;t very specific.\u00c2\u00a0 And look what pops up yesterday,\u00c2\u00a0 North Dakota &#8220;endorsing&#8221; transmission projects &#8220;in neighboring states.&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0 EH?\u00c2\u00a0 SAY WHAT?<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve put in a call to the ND PSC to get some primary documentation, will update if anything turns up.<\/p>\n<p>Found the docket on line &#8211; it&#8217;s a request for an &#8220;Advance Determination of Prudence&#8221; and the filings are here:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.psc.nd.gov\/database\/docket_view_list.php?s_dept=PU&amp;s_year_case=09&amp;s_seq_num=676&amp;s_company_name=Otter+Tail+Power+Company\"><strong>NORTH DAKOTA CAPX 2020 ADVANCE DETERMINATION OF PRUDENCE FILINGS<\/strong><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The article, in full below, covers actions of the PUC on Wednesday, and so must be based on their meeting yesterday, which is online:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.psc.nd.gov\/docs\/agendas\/2010\/100610-agenda.pdf\"><strong>AGENDA MEETING OCTOBER 6, 2010 &#8211; AUDIO<\/strong><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.psc.nd.gov\/database\/documents\/WD-0001\/030-010.pdf\"><strong>ADMIN MEETING &#8211; OCTOBER 6, 2010<\/strong><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In the meantime, you can check out their August 4, 2010 Worksession where CapX was discussed.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.psc.nd.gov\/docs\/minutes\/2010\/audio\/8410worksession.MP3\"><strong>AUDIO OF WORK SESSION &#8211; AUGUST 4, 2010<\/strong><\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s worth some time to hear their discussion of the Brookings line.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>THEY CONFIRM THAT MISO WAS DISCUSSING THE EXCESS OF POWER, THAT THERE&#8217;S &#8220;25% MORE POWER IN THE GRID THAN THEY NEED.&#8221;<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the news article that popped up today:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Oct 6, 10:43 PM EDT<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em><br \/>\n<strong>ND regulators endorse power line improvements<\/strong><\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) &#8212; North Dakota utility regulators on Wednesday endorsed three power line transmission projects in neighboring states that they said should provide safeguards against blackouts on the region&#8217;s electric grid.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Agreements with Xcel Energy Inc. and Otter Tail Power Co. also should help North Dakota ratepayers avoid paying the projects&#8217; development bills right away if they are never constructed, members of North Dakota&#8217;s Public Service Commission said. Regulators said they were confident the power lines will be built.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Xcel, which is based in Minneapolis, and Otter Tail, of Fergus Falls, Minn., asked the North Dakota PSC to review the transmission line projects and determine whether they were a prudent investment. The review will make it easier for the two utilities to win regulators&#8217; future approval of electric rate increases to pay for them.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The commissioners endorsed a new, 250-mile transmission line from Fargo to Monticello, Minn., northwest of Minneapolis; a 68-mile line between Bemidji, Minn., and Grand Rapids, Minn.; and a 150-mile line between Minneapolis-St. Paul and La Crosse, Wis.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Separately, they gave preliminary approval of a 200-mile line from eastern South Dakota to an area near Hampton, Minn., south of Minneapolis.<br \/>\n<!--more--><br \/>\nCommissioner Tony Clark said the three projects are designed to improve electricity reliability in the region, and costs will be allocated among all the utilities&#8217; customers. The projects were considered as a package because &#8220;something bad happening in any of those areas could dramatically impact all of eastern North Dakota,&#8221; Clark said.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>&#8220;You have to think of the transmission grid as, really, a regional transmission grid,&#8221; Clark said. &#8220;It&#8217;s not something that is solely supported in North Dakota or in any one particular state.&#8221;<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The 200-mile South Dakota line got only preliminary approval because the commission wants to revisit whether its primary purpose is to improve the grid&#8217;s reliability, or deliver newly generated electric power, Clark said. Those findings will determine how the power line&#8217;s costs are allocated among ratepayers.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The same advance approval process recently resulted in a $13.8 million bill for electric customers of Otter Tail and Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., of Bismarck, for an abandoned power plant expansion project.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The two utilities were part of a group of companies developing Big Stone II, a proposed 630-megawatt power plant that was to be built next door to an existing plant near Milbank, S.D.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The project was dropped last year, and the Public Service Commission recently agreed to allow Montana-Dakota Utilities and Otter Tail to bill their North Dakota customers over three years for their share of development expenses.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Montana-Dakota Utilities&#8217; residential customers will pay about $1.49 more monthly, utility filings say, while homeowners served by Otter Tail will pay an average of about 62 cents more each month.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Kevin Cramer, chairman of the North Dakota PSC, said the endorsement agreement for the power lines includes safeguards intended to make sure ratepayers don&#8217;t get stuck immediately with the development bill for another project that isn&#8217;t built.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The utilities could still attempt to recoup their costs by requesting a rate increase. However, that process is slower and more detailed, and involves scrutiny of a utility&#8217;s entire operation, Cramer said.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>The new power line projects, dubbed CapX2020, are being developed by a group of utilities. They are expected to cost $1.9 billion, with construction beginning in 2012 and lasting three years.<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/plainsdaily.com\/story\/6752\"><em>Otter Tail has about 59,000 North Dakota electric customers. It serves the cities of Devils Lake, Jamestown, Wahpeton and a number of rural towns. Xcel Energy has about 87,000 electric customers in Fargo, West Fargo, Grand Forks, Minot and some smaller communities.<\/em><br \/>\n<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There was a very strange report from North Dakota &#8211; somewhere on the CapX 2020 Fargo-St. Cloud road show last week, they were asked about the permitting status of that line in North Dakota, and we got some blather that <span class=\"excerpt-dots\">&hellip;<\/span> <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=2614\"><span class=\"more-msg\">Continue reading &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[429,212,385,370,337],"tags":[14,480,35,28],"class_list":["post-2614","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bemidji-grand-rapids","category-brookings-routing-docket","category-cost-recovery","category-fargo-st-cloud","category-hampton-alma","tag-capx-2020","tag-north-dakota-public-service-commission","tag-powerline","tag-transmission-line"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2614"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2616,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2614\/revisions\/2616"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2614"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2614"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2614"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}