{"id":4615,"date":"2012-10-26T14:11:11","date_gmt":"2012-10-26T21:11:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=4615"},"modified":"2012-11-03T10:49:34","modified_gmt":"2012-11-03T17:49:34","slug":"wisconsin-the-plot-thickens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=4615","title":{"rendered":"Wisconsin – the plot thickens…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Booted out… how can this be?<\/p>\n

Here’s everything leading up to today’s dreadful court order:<\/p>\n

Appeal Filings August 16, 2012<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

PSC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Objections filed 8\/29\/12<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

<\/em><\/p>\n

PSC Reply Brief September 17, 2012<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

NoCapX and CETF Response to PSC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Motions<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n

Xcel Letter – No Briefing on PSC\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Motions<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/em><\/em><\/p>\n

Judge Smith\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Letter and Scheduling Order<\/a>
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

No CapX 2020 and CETF Response October 12, 2012<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The PSC then filed its Reply in response to my Response:<\/p>\n

PSC October 23, 2012 Supplemental Response<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Check out p. 6 of their brief in particular, and the claim of using the Rothschild brief for reference — ummmmm… when they’re stating what the Marathon Circuit Order said?\u00c2\u00a0 Right…<\/p>\n

And the judge’s Order, by fax today:<\/h2>\n
\n

Order Granting Motion to Strike<\/a><\/h2>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Oh my… WOW…<\/h2>\n

At least in Minnesota the two Hampton-Rochester-La Crosse appeals are humming along, Initial Briefs due November 28th, and my Amicus Petition was approved by the Minnesota Supreme Court on the Buy the Farm case.<\/p>\n