{"id":6222,"date":"2015-09-25T13:47:39","date_gmt":"2015-09-25T20:47:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=6222"},"modified":"2015-09-25T21:52:04","modified_gmt":"2015-09-26T04:52:04","slug":"comments-sent-on-q-1d-south-rebuild","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=6222","title":{"rendered":"Comments sent on Q-1D South rebuild!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"mailbox\"<\/a><\/p>\n

SENT!\u00c2\u00a0 On behalf of No CapX 2020 I sent the following Comments:<\/p>\n

\n

No CapX 2020_Q-1D South_Comment_9-25-2015<\/a><\/h3>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I’ve asked how many times for more information, nada, still nothing.\u00c2\u00a0 N-O-T-H-I-N-G!<\/p>\n

Of particular note is this handy-dandy chart that Bruce McKay had put together for the Brookings docket, and I plugged in the voltage, amps, MVA and here’s what we get for magnetic fields for various options of this 795 ACSS 161 kV transmission line — CLICK FOR A BIGGER VERSION, this is all that will fit in this format:<\/p>\n

\"Q-1<\/a><\/p>\n

OK, Dairyland, USDA RUS — let’s see your calculations, let’s have disclosure of the peak and normal amps, the MVA, everything.\u00c2\u00a0 Show me this is wrong!\u00c2\u00a0 Note at what point mG levels drop to a 2-4 mG “safe” range.<\/p>\n

For those of you who haven’t yet asked for an extension of time to comment, or who haven’t yet sent in comments, there’s still time, until 11:59 p.m. Sunday!<\/p>\n

Send Comments, via email<\/strong><\/span> to BOTH:<\/p>\n