{"id":729,"date":"2009-06-08T12:42:45","date_gmt":"2009-06-08T19:42:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=729"},"modified":"2009-07-28T06:40:49","modified_gmt":"2009-07-28T13:40:49","slug":"what-about-this-eis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=729","title":{"rendered":"What about this EIS???"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>YEAAAAAAAAAA!\u00c2\u00a0 RUS EIS is on the way!!!<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s the big deal that the Rural Utility Service is doing an EIS on CapX 2020?\u00c2\u00a0 And just the LaCrosse line part of CapX 2020?<\/p>\n<p>Consider the piss-poor excuse of &#8220;environmental review&#8221; done in the Certificate of Need proceeding, when what was needed was the level of review in a RUS EIS.\u00c2\u00a0 Look at the state&#8217;s &#8220;scope&#8221; and look what was <strong>EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED:<\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/02\/environmentalreport-scope.pdf\">Scope of Environmental Report<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Then, look at the result:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/environmental-report2.pdf\">Environmental Report<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/04\/environmental-report-maps.pdf\">Environmental Report &#8211; Maps<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The state scope is very important because Commerce blew us off, saying that federal review wasn&#8217;t going to happen:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-federaleis.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-736 alignleft\" title=\"capx-federaleis\" src=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-federaleis.jpg\" alt=\"capx-federaleis\" width=\"424\" height=\"67\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>And they specifically said an EIS by RUS was not anticipated and blew off so many of us saying that they needed to do a joint EIS:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-rus.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-730\" title=\"capx-rus\" src=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-rus.jpg\" alt=\"capx-rus\" width=\"428\" height=\"60\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-rus.jpg 677w, https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-rus-300x42.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 428px) 100vw, 428px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">**************<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">So now, it appears, there will be an RUS EIS, because of the RUS money going in for Dairyland, and it&#8217;s stating what we knew all along.\u00c2\u00a0 By doing it this way, by doing it at this stage, at this late date, it limits RUS\u00c2\u00a0 review to just this one part of what we know is one big honkin&#8217; project, not just this Phase I group, but also Phase II and Phase III and who knows what all else.\u00c2\u00a0 They admit it in their Application, Appendix A-1 where they list the big chart of &#8220;common facilities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-commonfacilities1.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-732\" title=\"capx-commonfacilities1\" src=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-commonfacilities1-296x300.jpg\" alt=\"capx-commonfacilities1\" width=\"380\" height=\"386\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-commonfacilities1-296x300.jpg 296w, https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/capx-commonfacilities1.jpg 492w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 380px) 100vw, 380px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">As Carter Bishop always said in Contracts, &#8220;Well&#8230;. that&#8217;s one option.&#8221;\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 Here&#8217;s another:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">1) The important thing in this RUS EIS is to tie it all together, that this is just one small part of the plan, phased and connected actions, and they must address all:<\/p>\n<p>* Applied for in CoN as ONE PROJECT<br \/>\n* Needs all pieces to work<br \/>\n* Application lists the full spectrum of &#8220;common elements&#8221; that they want to build (see Application, Appendix A-1)<br \/>\n* The LaX to mid-WI has been announced<br \/>\n* Mississippi River is &#8220;only&#8221; one crossing and Minnesota River has two, TWICE the impacts, both are designated Scenic Byways, both have Federal Wildlife Management Areas.<\/p>\n<p>2) Systems alternatives must be addressed and the NO BUILD alternative must be addressed &#8211; and not &#8220;NO BUILD&#8221; for just that part, but for ALL OF IT.<\/p>\n<p>3) Another thing to bring in here is impact of this line if it is used for various capacity ranges of coal.\u00c2\u00a0 The wind lobby talks of getting 700MW of wind, BFD where potential capacity means it&#8217;s about 1\/6 of capacity&#8230; sigh&#8230;.this was NOT addressed in any way.<\/p>\n<p>* Line has 4,100MVA capacity.<br \/>\n* MISO goal is to displace natural gas with coal<br \/>\n* EIS must address emissions impacts of various scenarios of coal generation on CapX lines (and not just CO2):<br \/>\no 10% -\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0\u00c2\u00a0 410 MW<br \/>\no 30% &#8211; 1,230 MW<br \/>\no 50% &#8211; 2,050 MW<br \/>\no 75% &#8211; 3,033 MW<br \/>\no 85% &#8211; 3,485 MW<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Here&#8217;s a comparative emissions chart from a recent MPCA analysis, with some ballpark comparative levels for NOx, SO2, PM, Hg, CO2, and you can figure some estimates for 410, 1,230, 2,050, 3,033, 3,485 and 4,100MW of polluting:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-medium wp-image-734\" title=\"mpcafinal\" src=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/mpcafinal-300x157.jpg\" alt=\"mpcafinal\" width=\"300\" height=\"157\" srcset=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/mpcafinal-300x157.jpg 300w, https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/mpcafinal.jpg 790w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In case it&#8217;s not legible, here&#8217;s the chart in pdf:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/06\/mpcafinal.pdf\">MPCA Final &#8211; from Mesaba Project<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In short, if they put more coal on line, what emissions are enabled?\u00c2\u00a0 And then, what are impacts, because it would be wafting over Minnesota!\u00c2\u00a0 Dumping on Minnesota!<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">That all said, it seems to me that those are the things that need to be addressed in this EIS!\u00c2\u00a0 Those things that the state wouldn&#8217;t touch&#8230; wouldn&#8217;t touch because they know it poses a problem.\u00c2\u00a0 Now&#8217;s our chance!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>YEAAAAAAAAAA!\u00c2\u00a0 RUS EIS is on the way!!! So what&#8217;s the big deal that the Rural Utility Service is doing an EIS on CapX 2020?\u00c2\u00a0 And just the LaCrosse line part of CapX 2020? Consider the piss-poor excuse of &#8220;environmental review&#8221; <span class=\"excerpt-dots\">&hellip;<\/span> <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/?p=729\"><span class=\"more-msg\">Continue reading &rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,192],"tags":[14,155,154,35,152,153,75],"class_list":["post-729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-laws-rules","category-rus-eis","tag-capx-2020","tag-coal","tag-environmental-impact-statement","tag-powerline","tag-rural-utility-service","tag-trnsmission","tag-xcel-energy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=729"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":951,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/729\/revisions\/951"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/nocapx2020.info\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}