Why do they want CapX transmission?

Filed under:Brookings Routing Docket, Information Requests, News coverage — posted by admin on April 2, 2010 @ 7:56 am

southheartstorm

Well DUH, to transmit the unneeded coal-generated electricity to market to “displace natural gas.”

ICF - MISO Benefits Analysis Study

A storm is brewing over South Heart, North Dakota.  The South Heart coal plant and mine is in the news.

First the “benefication” plant, essentially drying out the wet lignite coal, almost exactly ONE YEAR AGO:

North Dakota Coal Dealt Setback

Great Northern Power Development withdrew its application for a new coal mine near South Heart, North Dakota. The company said it acted in response to a complaint filed at the North Dakota Public Service Commission by Plains Justice on behalf of Dakota Resource Council and local landowners. The complaint challenges the construction of a new coal preparation plant.

Now the coal plant — It was first touted as a “synfuels” plant (a la Beulah, argh, brilliant idea…) and now electricity, now that CapX 2020 permits are being approved.

Great Northern and Allied Syngas Stick with South Heart

svzschwarzpumpe

South Heart is west of Dickinson, in the middle between the north and south CapX 2020 Dakota extensions:

Hearing Ex. 13, Big Picture Map

Company seeks coal permit


Published March 31 2010

By: Ashley Martin, The Dickinson Press

A Houston company has taken another step toward their goal of constructing a $1.5 billion power plant and surface coal mine on 4,600 acres near South Heart.

South Heart Coal LLC, which is owned by Great Northern Power Development, applied for a mining permit Monday.

North Dakota’s Public Service Commission will review the application, said Jim Deutsch — director of PSC’s reclamation division.

It will take at least six months to process the application, he said.

“The application is for about 2.4 million tons of coal a year,” said Neal Messer, spokesperson for Great Northern.

Britt Huggins, whose home is just a few miles away from the proposed mine and plant, said the project makes her nervous.

“I have horses, I have dogs and I don’t so much like the idea of tearing up the countryside,” Huggins said. “Plus, what’s it going to do to our wildlife and our water?”

She is selling her home, but is having issues because it’s so close to the proposed mine.

“I’ve already had people look at it and say they’re worried about that coal mine,” Huggins said. “If it goes through, it’s going to change everybody’s way of life out there.”

The plant will be about six miles southwest of South Heart and the mine will be about three miles west of

the town, Messer said.

“It’s the biggest economic project in southwest North Dakota’s history,” Messer said.

Over 90 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted from the plant will be captured and used in other markets, Messer said. He added the company will comply with the Environmental Protection Agency’s standards.

“This plant will have no problem meeting or exceeding any of those standards,” Messer said.

The plant will use technology to gasify the coal and extract hydrogen, which will be used to generate 175 megawatts of electricity, Messer said. That’s enough to power 140,000 homes, he added.

Construction is set to begin in the fall of 2011 and they hope to be operational by 2014, Messer said. The project will create about 1,100 temporary jobs and 350 permanent jobs, Messer said.

Great Northern has also requested the land be rezoned from agricultural to industrial. The Stark County Zoning Board will hold a public hearing for the request Monday at 4 p.m.

The zoning board and Stark County commission approved the property to be rezoned about two years ago. However, a district judge overturned the decision because officials did not follow proper procedures.

Great Northern planned to produce synthetic natural gas two years ago, but changed their mind, Messer said.

“What happened was the natural gas market has deteriorated where that is not a profitable function at this point,” Messer said.

Messer expects Great Northern to apply for an air quality permit within the next few months.

Pete Kuntz, Stark County commissioner, said the project will be good for the area.

“We’ve got to look out for the majority of the people in the county, not only a few,” Kuntz said. “There’s way more people for than against.”

The coal would be mined by removing earth above the coal vein and stockpiling it, Messer said. Once the coal is removed, the earth will be replaced and put back to as close to its original state as possible, he added.

The mine would last about 30 years and the market will determine what happens to the plant after that, Messer said.

“If everything is the same as it is now, then they would go and try to find areas to expand,” Messer said.

GTL Energy USA Ltd. is constructing a coal beneficiation plant less than a half a mile away from Great Northern’s proposed project.

Messer, who is the spokesperson for Great Northern and GTL, said while they are two separate companies, Great Northern will use GTL Energy’s technology to make their plant more efficient.

New Prague - CapX EIS Scoping Meeting

Filed under:Information Requests, News coverage, Nuts & Bolts, PUC Docket — posted by admin on April 21, 2009 @ 11:39 am

newprague345capxmeeting2web

(Stolen from New Prague Times )Judy Marchif was among nearly 400 people attending the public meeting on the proposed CapX 2020 transmission line in the New Prague High Schools common area on Tuesday, April 7. (Patrick Fisher Photo)

Over 400 people!

Here’s the article from the New Prague Times — 400 people showed and stood up!  Special cheers for Nancy Sackett and her tremendous job of organizing, and U-CAN for getting the Task Forces rolling:

Questions, Opposition in majority at CapX meeting

Thursday, April 16, 2009

By Patrick Fisher, Staff Writer

A crowd estimated at nearly 400 people attended a public meeting at New Prague High School Tuesday, April 7, regarding the route permit application for the 345-kilovolt CapX 2020 transmission line.

Nearly everyone who spoke at the meeting listed concerns about the project in general or about having the line cut through the area.

CapX 2020 is a joint initiative of 11 utilities in Minnesota and the surrounding region. One of those agencies is Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, of which New Prague Utilities is a member.

The line would stretch along a 237-mile corridor from Brookings, SD, to Hampton in Dakota County. Locally, two possible routes have been identified for the line. The preferred route crosses the Minnesota River north of Le Sueur, veers north into Scott County in the Union Hill area, then heads east in the area of Scott County Road 2. An alternate route crosses the river south of Belle Plaine, goes south into Le Sueur County, then heads east approximately two miles south of New Prague into Rice County.

(more…)

Dates: PUC Hearing & Comments on EIS

Filed under:Information Requests, PUC Docket, Upcoming Events — posted by admin on April 13, 2009 @ 6:18 am

clockringing

Time to wake up and get to the hearing!

CapX Certificate of Need Argument & Deliberation

April 15th & 16, starting at 9:30 a.m.

Public Utilities Commission

Large Hearing Room - 3rd Floor

121 - 7th St. East

St. Paul, MN  55101

And Comments are due on April 30 - be sure to insist that they consider the impacts of “phased and connected actions” because there are so many, and the impacts are HUGE!  There’s CapX 2020, we’ve now got Phase I in front of us, and  there’s CapX 2020 Phase II and Phase III, there’s Joint Coordinated System Plan, there’s MTEP 08, there’s Green Power Express, there’s the announcement Friday Apri. 3rdof yet another Transmission Plan from Hell... the impacts are staggering…

Please include PUC Docket No. ET2/TL-08-1474 on your comments. Comments should be mailed, emailed, or faxed to:

Scott Ek

Project Manager
Minnesota Office of Energy Security
85 7th Place East, Suite 500
St. Paul, Minnesota, 55101-2198
Fax: 651-297-7891
scott.ek@state.mn.us

Comments may also be submitted on the Commission’s energy facility permitting website:

http://www.energyfacilities.puc.state.mn.us





NoCapX sends more IRs to Applicants

Filed under:Information Requests, PUC Docket — posted by admin on May 7, 2008 @ 1:14 pm

Oops, forgot to post these from Monday, the most recent NoCapX IRs to “the utilities presently known as the applicants.”

NoCapX 2020 IR to CapX 2

NoCapX 2020 IR to CapX 3

NoCapX 2020 IR to CapX 4

NoCapX 2020 IR to CapX 5

NoCapX 2020 IR to CapX 6

More to follow…

First bunch of NoCapX IRs for MISO

Filed under:Information Requests — posted by admin on April 25, 2008 @ 1:38 pm

As you know, MISO, Midwest Independent System Operator, intervened in the CapX 2020 docket.  So now it’s time to fire off a few Information Requests to them:

NoCapX 2020 IR to MISO 1-2

NoCapX 2020 IR to MISO 3-8

The fun never sets…

Information Requests and ISLR site

Filed under:Information Requests, PUC Docket — posted by admin on March 27, 2008 @ 5:19 pm

Info is coming out slowly but surely on CapX 2020’s transmission lie plan from hell!

Two things to note:

NEW ANSWERS TO INFO REQUESTS POSTED 

And there goes John Baily, showing us how to do a good site, grrrrrr, hard to keep up (and thanks John, for all those IRs I didn’t have, and neener neener, I’ve got a few you don’t have).

ILSR’s CapX 2020 site

And once more with feeling, the full PUC docket for CapX 2020 is:

 CLICK HERE and search for 06-1115

There, that oughtta keep ya busy…

Information Requests to/fro Applicants

Filed under:Information Requests, PUC Docket, Reports - Documents — posted by admin on March 23, 2008 @ 2:05 pm

Thought occurs to me that it’d be useful to have the Interrogatories so anyone who wants to know what’s being asked can have a look-see. SO, here they are - as I get answers, I’ll post those too, but as of right now, it’s all questions…

And slowly, I’m adding answers now.

FYI, John Baily has been busy, CLICK HERE FOR ILSR.ORG’S CAPX SITE!

COMMERCE

Ham-03-03-08

Rakow-02-20-08-IR40

Pierce-01-22-08-IR41-42

Rakow-02-20-08-IR43-44

Pierce-03-03-08 IR49-58

Shaw 3-21-08 IR60

NAWO/ILSR

NAWO/ILSR Corrected 7

NAWO/ILSR IR8

NAWO/ILSR IR9

NAWO/ILSR IR10

NAWO/ILSR IR11

NAWO/ILSR IR12

NAWO/ILSR IR13

NAWO/ILSR IR14

NO CAPX 2020 (more after I get up to date)

Data Practices Act Request - way old

NO CAPX IR 1

XCEL RESPONSES TO VARIOUS PARTIES

Xcel Response to Commerce 1-32

Xcel Response to Commerce 33&36

Xcel Response to Commerce 37-38

Xcel Response to Commerce 39

Xcel Response to Commerce 41

Xcel Response to Commerce 42

Xcel Response to Commerce 43

Xcel Response to Commerce 49

Xcel Response to Commerce 50

Xcel Response to Commerce 51

Xcel Response to Commerce 52

Xcel Response to Commerce 53

Xcel Response to Commerce 54

Xcel Response to Commerce 55

Xcel Response to Commerce 57

Xcel Response to NAWO 2-6

Xcel Response to WOW 1-2



image: detail of installation by Bronwyn Lace