Booted out of FERC
We got the FERC Order earlier this a.m. dismissing our Complaint, it took them 22 pages to do it:
Sigh… they recommend we participate in the MISO MTEP process:
We encourage Complainants to work with MISO and other stakeholders in developing transmission plans for the MISO region in the future as part of MISO’s Order Nos. 890- and 1000-compliant transmission planning process.
… stating that:
MISO posts on its website, and notifies interested registered parties through an email exploder list, all stakeholder meetings. MISO’s MTEP is developed with stakeholder involvement through various stakeholder forums, including the Planning Advisory Committee, the Planning Subcommittee and Sub-Regional Planning meetings held in various locations throughout MISO’s regional footprint. Stakeholders have the ability to participate in person or through MISO’s webcasts and teleconferencing of such meetings.
Well, let’s see, that presumes that MISO’s transmission planning process is compliant. Here’s their organizational chart:
You can sign up for a profile here and register for meeting notifications, etc., which I’ve done, and have also sent an email to Jeff Webb, the PAC Liason. CLICK HERE TO MAKE PROFILE
CAVEAT: We can only participate as a non-member, non-voting, and this footnote to the “environmental/other stakeholder member groups” members:
These groups are:
VII. ENV’L/OTHER STKHDR GROUPS(Non-Members)1. Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana2. Clean Wisconsin3. Environmental Law & Policy Center4. Fresh Energy5. Great Plains Institute6. Izaak Walton League of America7. Project for Sustainable FERC Energy Policy8. Wind on the Wires
Here’s the membership of their Planning Advisory Committee.
What affects us most in this area is the “Northern Area Study” and here’s the June 2013 Northern Area Study.
Sorry! That sucks.