ITC Midwest MN/IA – Reply Briefs are in
The Reply Briefs are in on the ITC Midwest MN/IA 345 kV transmission project.  MECA, et al.’s is really a hoot. A couple of them say “no full party intervenors oppose/disagree” or some such but then there’s the Commerce Reply Brief. Yup, it ain’t only Overland, errrrr… argument of counsel. You’ll have a little more trouble dissing Commerce DER with the Commission. Yes, the Commerce DER Reply Brief takes the cake.
DER specifically disagrees that the record supports:
Cool. I love it when that happens…
Here are the Reply Briefs in the ITC Midwest docket:
Applicants_Reply Brief_CoN_20148-102143-03
Applicants_Reply Brief_Route_20148-102143-03-1
MCEA_Reply Brief_ CoN20148-102133-01
MISO_Reply Brief_CoN 20148-102132-01
Commerce DER_Reply Brief CoN 20148-102138-02
CommerceEERA_Reply Brief Route_20148-102140-02
Comments
ITC Midwest MN/IA – Reply Briefs are in — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>