New “need” supplemental report for Hampton-LaCrosse
Oh, of course, I’m snoozing and they’re working working working making up a new “need” report for the Wisconsin CPCN docket (05-CE-136) to supplement what’s already been filed in Minnesota and Wisconsin.
So now let’s divert from writing the MN Hampton-LaCrosse brief and read this crap…
$50 THEY DON’T MENTION THAT THEY’RE NOT UTILIZING DEMAND RESPONSE DURING “PEAK DEMAND!”
Comments
New “need” supplemental report for Hampton-LaCrosse — No Comments
HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>