New “need” supplemental report for Hampton-LaCrosse

Filed under:Wisconsin — posted by admin on August 31, 2011 @ 1:57 pm

Oh, of course, I’m snoozing and they’re working working working making up a new “need” report for the Wisconsin CPCN docket (05-CE-136) to supplement what’s already been filed in Minnesota and Wisconsin.

manurespreaderThere they go again…

Xcel Supplemental Need Study – August 2011

So now let’s divert from writing the MN Hampton-LaCrosse brief and read this crap…

$50 THEY DON’T MENTION THAT THEY’RE NOT UTILIZING DEMAND RESPONSE DURING “PEAK DEMAND!”

zero comments so far »

Please leave a comment below!

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)




image: detail of installation by Bronwyn Lace