Buy the Farm Wisconsin style!

Filed under:Wisconsin — posted by admin on July 31, 2013 @ 8:17 pm

transmission-sw-mn

Thanks to Block RICL for sending this around, this is such good news I can hardly stand it!

The issues the court looked at:

(1) At what point in a Wis. Stat. § 32.06 condemnation proceeding must a property owner raise an uneconomic remnant claim?
(2) Were the Wallers left with an uneconomic remnant after ATC took two easements on their
property?
(3) Are the Wallers entitled to litigation expenses?
(4) Are the Wallers “displaced persons,” entitling them to relocation benefits?

How good can it get?  Here’s the decision:

Waller v American Transmission Company

Enjoy!

zero comments so far »

Please leave a comment below!

Copy link for RSS feed for comments on this post or for TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)




image: detail of installation by Bronwyn Lace